---
title: "Atera vs ScreenConnect: how to compare them properly"
description: "A vendor-neutral comparison of Atera and ScreenConnect: what each product is for, how their licensing meters differ, whether each covers attended and unattended access, the security and audit questions to ask both, and a two-week trial that produces a defensible decision."
canonical_url: https://rmm247connect.app/compare/atera-vs-screenconnect
section: "Head to head"
product: 247connect
product_website: https://www.247connect.cloud/
site: "247connect Knowledge Hub"
author: "247connect Marketing Team"
date_published: 2026-02-02
date_modified: 2026-08-27
language: en-GB
license: Quotation and citation permitted with attribution to 247connect.
---

# Atera vs ScreenConnect: how to compare them properly

**Written for:** IT managers, MSPs and support leads shortlisting Atera and ScreenConnect, or reviewing an existing subscription to one of them.  
**Reading time:** 8 min read

## Summary

Atera is a rmm platform and ScreenConnect is a remote support tool with self-hosting options, so the honest answer to which is better depends on the job you are buying for. Atera is metered on per technician, with unlimited devices while ScreenConnect is metered on concurrent technician licences which means headline prices are not comparable until you apply both to your own headcount and device count. Because they are different classes of product, decide what the job is first: continuous management of an estate you own, or fast access to devices you may not control.

## Key takeaways

- Atera: An RMM and professional services automation platform priced per technician rather than per device, aimed at MSPs and internal IT teams.
- ScreenConnect: A technician-oriented remote support tool, historically popular with MSPs, offered with cloud and self-hosted deployment options.
- Licensing meters differ (per technician, with unlimited devices against concurrent technician licences), so compare twelve-month totals for your own numbers.
- Access models: Atera is unattended only in practice; ScreenConnect is attended and unattended.
- Test session speed on a domestic or mobile connection, never on the office network where everything feels instant.
- Read the audit log after your trial sessions and ask whether it would satisfy your own auditor.
- Run both on live tickets for a fortnight and let the technicians who used them decide.

## What each product is for

These two are not the same class of product, which is the most important thing to establish before comparing them line by line. Atera is a rmm platform: An RMM and professional services automation platform priced per technician rather than per device, aimed at MSPs and internal IT teams. ScreenConnect is a remote support tool with self-hosting options: A technician-oriented remote support tool, historically popular with MSPs, offered with cloud and self-hosted deployment options.

Comparing them is still legitimate, because plenty of teams genuinely are choosing between them, but it should be framed as a question about the job rather than the feature list. Pick the job first, then the tool that does it, and treat overlapping features as a bonus rather than the deciding factor.

- Atera: RMM platform. An RMM and professional services automation platform priced per technician rather than per device, aimed at MSPs and internal IT teams.
- ScreenConnect: Remote support tool with self-hosting options. A technician-oriented remote support tool, historically popular with MSPs, offered with cloud and self-hosted deployment options.

## Licensing: the meters, not the headline prices

The meters are different in kind, not just in price, which is why headline figures mislead here. Atera bills on per technician, with unlimited devices; ScreenConnect bills on concurrent technician licences. A team of four supporting nine hundred devices and a team of twelve supporting eighty devices will get opposite answers from the same two quotes, so run your own numbers rather than anybody's example.

Atera: The per-technician meter with an unmetered device count is unusual in this category and suits estates with many endpoints per engineer. It works against you if you have very few devices and several part-time operators.

ScreenConnect: The usual meter is concurrent technician seats rather than named users, so a team can share a smaller pool of licences across shifts. That is efficient for follow-the-sun desks and a hard ceiling for teams that all work the same hours.

Prices and packaging in this market change several times a year, so this page deliberately quotes none. Take the meter descriptions above, apply them to your own operator count, shift pattern and device count on each vendor's current pricing page, and compare the two twelve-month totals including renewal.

## Attended and unattended access

Atera is built around reaching machines you already manage, with an agent deployed ahead of time. That is the right model for servers, shared workstations and a known estate, and the wrong model for helping somebody whose device you have never touched.

Write down the proportion of your last hundred tickets that were attended and unattended before you compare anything else. That single ratio usually eliminates one of these two tools outright, and it is far cheaper to discover it now than three months into a contract.

## Platform coverage across a real estate

Coverage only matters where your awkward devices live. Most estates have a handful: a Linux build server, a Mac in the design team, a warehouse terminal on an old Windows build, a headless machine in a comms cupboard. Those are the machines to test, not the standard laptop everything supports.

Atera covers windows, macOS and Linux, with network device discovery.

ScreenConnect covers windows, macOS and Linux for endpoints, with mobile viewer apps for operators.

Take your five most awkward devices and connect to each one during the trial. If a tool cannot reach them, no amount of feature comparison rescues it.

## Security and administration questions for both

Ask both vendors the same short list, in writing, and compare the answers rather than the marketing. How is a session authenticated and can you enforce two-factor authentication on every operator? Is traffic encrypted end to end, and with what? Does the endpoint agent connect outbound, or does something have to be exposed inbound? Can you scope an operator to a subset of devices, and revoke that access in one action when somebody leaves?

Then ask what the audit log actually records, because this is where products differ most and datasheets say least. You want the named operator, the device, the start and end time, the client address and any file transferred, retained long enough to satisfy your own policy and exportable before a subscription lapses. A log you cannot export is evidence you do not really have.

- Verify on Atera: Remote control is generally delivered through integrations, so confirm which one you are actually getting and how it is licensed.
- Verify on Atera: Part-time and occasional operators still consume a technician seat.
- Verify on ScreenConnect: If you self-host, count the cost of the server, patching and TLS certificate management as part of the total.
- Verify on ScreenConnect: Concurrent licensing punishes a team that all starts work at the same time, so model your actual shift pattern.

## Which one fits which team

The useful output of a comparison is not a winner, it is a sentence describing the team each tool suits. If neither sentence below describes yours, both are probably the wrong shortlist and the requirement needs rewriting before you look at another vendor.

- Choose Atera if: Small MSPs and internal teams with a high device-to-engineer ratio.
- Choose ScreenConnect if: MSPs and shift-based support desks, particularly those wanting a self-hosted option.
- The question to settle about Atera: Which remote control engine does it actually use, and is that engine licensed separately?
- The question to settle about ScreenConnect: Does concurrent licensing genuinely match your shift pattern, or will your busiest hour hit the ceiling?

## A two-week trial that settles Atera against ScreenConnect

1. **Write the requirement down first** — Five lines: the ratio of attended to unattended tickets, the platforms in the estate, the security controls you must be able to evidence, the reporting somebody asks you for, and your twelve-month budget. Compare against this, not against feature lists.
2. **Enrol the same ten devices in both** — Include your five most awkward machines. Same devices in both trials, or you are not comparing anything.
3. **Run live tickets, not demos** — Give each tool a week of real work with the technicians who will own it. A demo tests the salesperson; a ticket tests the product.
4. **Time the boring things** — Seconds from click to control, on a home or mobile connection. File transfer both ways. Multi-monitor. A reboot with automatic reconnection. These are the moments repeated dozens of times a day.
5. **Read the audit log afterwards** — Open the log for the sessions you ran and ask whether it names the operator, the device, the times and any file moved, and whether you can export it.
6. **Price twelve months, including renewal** — Apply both meters to your real numbers, add the second year, and ask each supplier in writing what the renewal uplift will be.

## Atera and ScreenConnect side by side

| Atera | ScreenConnect |
| --- | --- |
| RMM platform | Remote support tool with self-hosting options |
| Per technician, with unlimited devices | Concurrent technician licences |
| Unattended only in practice | Attended and unattended |
| Windows, macOS and Linux, with network device discovery. | Windows, macOS and Linux for endpoints, with mobile viewer apps for operators. |
| Small MSPs and internal teams with a high device-to-engineer ratio. | MSPs and shift-based support desks, particularly those wanting a self-hosted option. |
| Which remote control engine does it actually use, and is that engine licensed separately? | Does concurrent licensing genuinely match your shift pattern, or will your busiest hour hit the ceiling? |

## Common mistakes

- Comparing headline per-seat prices across two different meters, which is the single most expensive mistake in this category.
- Testing on the office network, where every tool feels fast and the difference you are paying for is invisible.
- Assuming a capability is included because the vendor sells it, rather than checking the plan on your quote.
- Letting a demo stand in for a trial, so the tool is judged on the salesperson's estate rather than yours.
- Ignoring the audit trail until an incident or an audit makes it urgent.
- Forgetting to ask about renewal, then discovering the uplift when the decision is already sunk.

## Where 247connect fits

- **Fixed, predictable pricing:** Unlimited operators with five concurrent connections per user, so the bill does not move every time the team grows or a shift pattern changes.
- **Both access models in one console:** Managed (unattended) access to devices you own and on-demand (attended) access to devices you do not, without buying two products.
- **Fast time to session:** Sessions typically connect in around eight seconds, which is the number a support desk feels dozens of times a day.
- **Zero-trust, AES-256 encrypted:** Outbound agent connections with no inbound port to forward, and every session logged against a named operator.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Atera or ScreenConnect better?

Neither is better in the abstract, and any page that says otherwise is selling something. Atera suits small MSPs and internal teams with a high device-to-engineer ratio. ScreenConnect suits mSPs and shift-based support desks, particularly those wanting a self-hosted option. Establish which of those descriptions matches your team, then trial the one that fits on your own tickets for two weeks.

### How do the licensing models differ?

Atera is metered on per technician, with unlimited devices and ScreenConnect on concurrent technician licences Because the meters differ in kind, compare twelve-month totals for your actual headcount and device count rather than headline per-seat figures. Ask both suppliers to quote the renewal price at the same time.

### Do both handle unattended access to servers?

Atera: yes, unattended access to machines with an agent deployed is part of what it does. ScreenConnect: yes, unattended access is part of what it does. In every case, confirm unattended access is on the specific plan you are quoting, and test a reboot-and-reconnect on a real server before you commit.

### What should I test during a trial?

Time to a working session on a domestic or mobile connection, not the office LAN. A multi-monitor session. A file transfer both ways. A reboot with automatic reconnection. Then read the audit log for the sessions you just ran and decide whether it would satisfy an auditor.

### Where does 247connect fit against these two?

247connect is a focused remote access and support layer rather than the broadest platform on the market. It covers managed and on-demand access in one console, on fixed pricing with unlimited operators and five concurrent connections each, with zero-trust outbound connections and AES-256 encryption. If your requirement is fast, secure, predictably priced sessions rather than a wide management suite, it is worth putting in the same trial fortnight.

## In 247connect

If the shortlist is really about fast, secure and predictably priced remote sessions rather than the broadest possible platform, add 247connect to the same trial fortnight. It covers managed and on-demand access in one console, with unlimited operators on fixed pricing, five concurrent connections per user, zero-trust outbound agent connections and AES-256 encryption. The 14-day trial includes 2 on-demand licences and 10 managed devices, with no credit card required, so you can measure it on the same ten devices you gave Atera and ScreenConnect.

---

Source page: https://rmm247connect.app/compare/atera-vs-screenconnect
Product website: https://www.247connect.cloud/