Alternatives ยท 9 min read
Choosing a ConnectWise ScreenConnect alternative without guessing
Written for: MSPs, internal IT teams and support managers reviewing a ScreenConnect renewal or planning a move away from a self-hosted deployment.
Written by the 247connect Marketing Team
Concurrency and hosting
In short
ScreenConnect is best known for concurrent-technician licensing and for being available in both cloud and self-hosted forms, so a replacement evaluation has to answer two questions the rest of this category does not: how many technicians are ever connected at the same time, and whether you genuinely need to run the service on your own infrastructure. Once those are settled, the decision looks like every other remote support comparison: time to session, access models, administrator security controls, platform coverage and twelve-month cost under each vendor's meter.
Key takeaways
- Count peak concurrent sessions, not headcount: concurrent licensing rewards teams whose technicians rarely connect at the same moment.
- Self-hosting buys control and costs maintenance; price the patching, certificates, backups and uptime, not just the licence.
- Migrating away from a self-hosted deployment means planning agent replacement and log export before anything is cancelled.
- Confirm unattended access, session recording and reporting sit in the plan you are quoting.
- Remote support tooling is internet-facing privileged access, so patch cadence and vendor advisory history are legitimate scoring rows.
- Trial two candidates on live tickets before deciding, and record time to session every time.
Concurrency is the number that matters
Concurrent-technician licensing charges for how many sessions run at the same time rather than how many people could start one. For a desk of eight where three are typically connected at once, that is a materially different bill from a named-seat model, and it is the single biggest reason teams either stay or move.
Before comparing anything, pull a fortnight of session data and find your genuine peak. Then apply each candidate's meter to that number and to your headcount. A product with named seats can still win if the seat price is low enough, and a concurrent product can lose if your peak is close to your headcount.
Self-hosted or cloud: price the whole thing
Self-hosting a remote support server gives you control over where session data lives and how the service is configured, which matters for some regulated environments. It also makes you responsible for a public-facing service that grants privileged access to every machine you manage.
Cost the operational side honestly: operating system and application patching on a security-sensitive cadence, TLS certificate renewal, backups and restore testing, monitoring, capacity and someone available when it fails during a major incident. If those hours are not funded, a hosted service is usually the safer and cheaper answer.
If data residency is the reason for self-hosting, ask hosted candidates directly which region their session metadata sits in. That answer often removes the requirement entirely.
The comparison rows that decide it
Once concurrency and hosting are settled, the rest of the evaluation is the standard one. Score every candidate on the same sheet rather than on the table a vendor supplies.
- Time to a working session from click to desktop, on a normal broadband or 4G connection.
- Managed (unattended) and on-demand (attended) access, both included rather than separate purchases.
- Peak concurrent sessions supported, and what happens when you exceed them.
- Enforced multi-factor authentication on operator accounts, group-scoped permissions and session consent.
- Audit logging: what is recorded, retention period and export format.
- Platform coverage across the real estate, including older Windows builds and any Linux machines.
- Silent agent deployment, and outbound-only connectivity with no inbound firewall rule.
- Vendor security advisory history and patch cadence for the remote access component itself.
- Twelve-month cost under each vendor's own current pricing, applied to your peak and your device count.
Migration from a self-hosted deployment
Moving away from a self-hosted server is a slightly larger job than swapping one hosted tool for another, but it is still measured in days. The work is agent replacement across the estate, updating documentation that names the old product, and dealing with the server itself.
Do three things before you decommission anything. Export the audit history you are required to retain, because it usually lives only on that server. Confirm every access route the old deployment quietly served, including out-of-hours server access and any single kiosk nobody thinks about. Deploy the new agent alongside the old one for a fortnight, then remove the old agent through the same automated task rather than as a later tidy-up.
Common mistakes
- Comparing named-seat prices against concurrent prices without applying either to real session data.
- Treating self-hosting as free because the licence line looks smaller.
- Leaving an internet-facing remote support server unpatched between renewals.
- Decommissioning the old server before exporting audit logs.
- Missing an access route the old deployment served, such as an out-of-hours path to a single server.
Frequently asked questions
- Is concurrent licensing always cheaper?
- No. Concurrent licensing wins when your peak simultaneous sessions are well below headcount, which is common on small and mid-sized desks. If most of your technicians are connected at the same time during business hours, the gap narrows and a named-seat or fixed-price model can be cheaper. The only reliable answer comes from applying each meter to a fortnight of your own session data.
- Should I self-host remote support software?
- Only if you have a specific control or residency requirement and funded hours to run a public-facing privileged service properly: security patching, certificate renewal, backups, monitoring and out-of-hours cover. Otherwise a hosted service with a stated hosting region is usually lower risk and lower total cost.
- How do I move agents off a self-hosted deployment?
- Deploy the new agent alongside the incumbent across the estate, verify coverage against your device inventory, then remove the old agent through the same automated task. Export any audit history you are required to retain before decommissioning the server, since that data typically does not survive it.
- What security rows belong in a remote support comparison?
- Encryption in transit and key length, enforced MFA on operator accounts, group-scoped permissions, end-user consent on attended sessions, what the audit log records and how long it is kept, hosting region, and the vendor's published advisory and patch history for the remote access component itself.
Why teams choose 247connect
Fixed, predictable pricing
Unlimited operators with five concurrent connections per user, so the bill does not move every time the team grows.
Both access models included
Managed (unattended) access to devices you own and on-demand (attended) access to devices you do not, in the same console.
Fast time to session
Sessions typically connect in around eight seconds, which is the number a support desk feels dozens of times a day.
Zero-trust, AES-256 encrypted
Outbound agent connections with no inbound port to forward, and session activity logged against a named operator.
Try it on your own estate
A 14-day trial with 2 on-demand licences and 10 managed devices, no credit card required.
Where 247connect fits: it is a hosted, fixed-price remote access and support layer with unlimited operators and five concurrent connections per user, which suits teams whose concurrency maths has become the awkward part of a renewal. It does not offer a self-hosted deployment, so if on-premise control is a hard requirement it is not the right answer. If it is not, the 14-day trial covers ten managed devices and two on-demand licences, which is enough to compare against your current desk.
More alternatives and pricing guides
NinjaOne alternative
A vendor-neutral guide to evaluating a NinjaOne alternative: deciding whether you need a full RMM platform or a focused remote access layer, how per-device licensing scales, which modules teams actually use, and how to test the shortlist.
Atera alternative
A vendor-neutral guide to evaluating an Atera alternative: how per-technician pricing behaves as an estate grows, which bundled modules teams really use, the security and audit rows to score, and a practical trial plan.
LogMeIn alternative
A vendor-neutral guide to reviewing a LogMeIn renewal and evaluating alternatives: separating remote access from the wider bundle, modelling twelve months under each licensing meter, the security rows that matter, and migrating without losing audit history.