Tools & calculators

Turn remote support numbers into a business case

Five free, client-side calculators for IT and support teams: work out cost per endpoint, the true cost of downtime, the return on remote support, how licensing models scale as you grow, and when to plan a hardware refresh. Every calculator runs entirely in your browser — nothing you type is sent anywhere.

A calculator feeding figures into a business-case forecast1,248.50INPUTSThree-year forecastYear 1Year 3OUTPUTS AND BUSINESS CASE

The five calculators

Each calculator shows its formula in plain words, a worked example, and a short FAQ, so you can check the maths before you rely on the output.

Why bother modelling this at all

How these numbers help you build a business case

Most remote support and RMM buying decisions get stuck at the same point: everyone agrees the current setup is slow or expensive, but nobody has a number to put in front of finance. A rough estimate in a spreadsheet is usually enough to unblock that conversation, provided the assumptions are visible and the maths is honest.

These calculators are deliberately simple. They take the inputs you already know: endpoint counts, ticket volumes, loaded hourly cost, licence quotes, and turn them into a monthly or annual figure, plus a comparison where one is useful, such as the crossover point between two pricing models or the payback period on a new tool. Nothing is sent to a server: every calculation runs in your browser, so you can use real internal numbers without them leaving your machine.

None of the outputs are a substitute for a proper quote or a detailed cost model, and they should not be read as a promise of savings. They are a starting point: a way to sanity-check a hunch, or to put a first, defensible number on a slide before you go and get exact figures from suppliers and finance.

Calculators and tools

Putting numbers behind an IT support decision

By 247connect Marketing Team · Last reviewed 27 August 2026

Calculator inputs including ticket volume, time saved, loaded cost and downtime feeding a three-year business caseTickets per monthVolumeMinutes savedPer ticketLoaded hourly costSalary plus costsDowntime per hourCost of stopped workIN BROWSERLabour savedTravel avoidedDowntime avoidedNothing is storedThree-yearcost and returnRange, with assumptions
Calculator panels feeding cost, downtime, licensing and response-time figures into a single decision.
Nothing is stored
In browser
Standard TCO horizon
3 years
Time-saving basis
Per ticket
Concurrency measure
Peak

Most IT business cases fail on arithmetic, not on argument

The case for better remote support is easy to make qualitatively and hard to make quantitatively, which is why it often loses to something with a spreadsheet attached. The numbers are not difficult, though. Time saved per ticket multiplied by ticket volume is a labour figure. Avoided site visits multiplied by travel cost and hours is a second. Downtime avoided, valued at whatever an hour of stopped work costs your organisation, is usually the largest and the one people forget to include.

These calculators do that arithmetic with your figures rather than a vendor's. Everything runs in your browser, so nothing you type is sent anywhere or stored, and you can put a real salary cost or a real hourly downtime value in without worrying about where it ends up.

  • Labour: minutes saved per ticket, at a loaded hourly rate, across your real ticket volume
  • Travel: site visits avoided, including the hours lost travelling rather than just mileage
  • Downtime: hours of stopped work avoided, valued at your own cost per hour
  • Licensing: peak concurrent sessions rather than headcount, modelled over three years

The inputs worth getting right

Two inputs dominate every one of these models. The first is your loaded hourly cost, which is salary plus employment costs divided by actual productive hours, not salary divided by 2,080. Using the wrong figure understates every saving by roughly a third. The second is peak concurrency, which is the highest number of sessions running at the same moment rather than the number of people who might connect. Teams routinely overestimate it by a factor of two or more, and it is the number concurrency-based licensing is priced on.

For downtime, use a figure your finance team would recognise. A number you invented will be challenged; a number derived from revenue per hour or from staff cost per hour will not.

Use the output as evidence, not as a verdict

A calculator produces a defensible estimate, not a decision. The useful output is a range with the assumptions written next to it, because that is what survives a conversation with someone who did not build the model. Every calculator here shows its working for that reason, and each one is paired with the guide that explains the reasoning behind the formula.

Building the business case in four steps

  1. 1

    Gather four real numbers

    Monthly ticket volume, average handling time, loaded hourly cost, and cost of an hour of downtime. Estimates are fine as long as you note them as estimates.

  2. 2

    Model the current state first

    Cost the way you work now, including travel and waiting. A saving is only credible next to a baseline someone recognises.

  3. 3

    Run the comparison over three years

    One year flatters tools with low entry pricing and hides renewal increases. Three years is the horizon most approvals are judged over.

  4. 4

    Present a range with the assumptions attached

    A conservative and an optimistic figure, with the inputs listed, is far more persuasive than a single confident number nobody can reproduce.

Frequently asked questions

How do you calculate the ROI of remote support software?
Add the labour saved (minutes per ticket times ticket volume at a loaded hourly rate), the travel avoided (site visits times cost and hours), and the downtime avoided (hours times your cost per hour). Subtract the licence and rollout cost, then express the result over three years so renewals are included.
What is a loaded hourly cost and why does it matter?
It is salary plus employer costs divided by genuinely productive hours, rather than headline salary divided by total hours. It is typically 25 to 40 per cent higher than the naive figure, and using the naive figure understates every saving in the model.
How many concurrent remote sessions does a team actually need?
Far fewer than its headcount. Count the highest number of sessions running simultaneously during a busy period, not the number of people with a login. Most small teams peak at two or three, which is why concurrency-based licensing is usually cheaper than per-technician pricing for them.
Is any data from these calculators sent anywhere?
No. Every calculation runs in your browser. Nothing you enter is transmitted, logged or stored, so you can use real salary, cost and downtime figures without them leaving the machine.

Where 247connect fits

If the model points at concurrency-based licensing, 247connect prices exactly that way: unlimited operators with five concurrent connections per user on fixed pricing, so the figure you model is the figure you pay.

Related across the hub