Head to head · 8 min read
LogMeIn / GoTo vs TeamViewer: how to compare them properly
Written for: IT managers, MSPs and support leads shortlisting LogMeIn / GoTo and TeamViewer, or reviewing an existing subscription to one of them.
Written by the 247connect Marketing Team · Last reviewed 27 August 2026
Head to head
In short
LogMeIn / GoTo is a remote access and it support suite and TeamViewer is a remote support and remote access suite, so the honest answer to which is better depends on the job you are buying for. LogMeIn / GoTo is metered on per-technician subscriptions with bundled modules while TeamViewer is metered on named operator licences with concurrency limits which means headline prices are not comparable until you apply both to your own headcount and device count. Because they are different classes of product, decide what the job is first: continuous management of an estate you own, or fast access to devices you may not control.
Key takeaways
- LogMeIn / GoTo: A remote access and IT support suite, now largely presented under the GoTo brand, bundling remote support with adjacent helpdesk and management modules.
- TeamViewer: A long-established remote support and remote access suite covering attended helpdesk work, unattended device access and a range of add-on modules.
- Licensing meters differ (per-technician subscriptions with bundled modules against named operator licences with concurrency limits), so compare twelve-month totals for your own numbers.
- Access models: LogMeIn is attended and unattended; TeamViewer is attended and unattended.
- Test session speed on a domestic or mobile connection, never on the office network where everything feels instant.
- Read the audit log after your trial sessions and ask whether it would satisfy your own auditor.
- Run both on live tickets for a fortnight and let the technicians who used them decide.
What each product is for
These two are not the same class of product, which is the most important thing to establish before comparing them line by line. LogMeIn / GoTo is a remote access and it support suite: A remote access and IT support suite, now largely presented under the GoTo brand, bundling remote support with adjacent helpdesk and management modules. TeamViewer is a remote support and remote access suite: A long-established remote support and remote access suite covering attended helpdesk work, unattended device access and a range of add-on modules.
Comparing them is still legitimate, because plenty of teams genuinely are choosing between them, but it should be framed as a question about the job rather than the feature list. Pick the job first, then the tool that does it, and treat overlapping features as a bonus rather than the deciding factor.
- LogMeIn / GoTo: Remote access and IT support suite. A remote access and IT support suite, now largely presented under the GoTo brand, bundling remote support with adjacent helpdesk and management modules.
- TeamViewer: Remote support and remote access suite. A long-established remote support and remote access suite covering attended helpdesk work, unattended device access and a range of add-on modules.
Licensing: the meters, not the headline prices
The meters are different in kind, not just in price, which is why headline figures mislead here. LogMeIn / GoTo bills on per-technician subscriptions with bundled modules; TeamViewer bills on named operator licences with concurrency limits. A team of four supporting nine hundred devices and a team of twelve supporting eighty devices will get opposite answers from the same two quotes, so run your own numbers rather than anybody's example.
LogMeIn / GoTo: Licensing tends to be per technician, with capability grouped into bundles that also include adjacent products. That can be good value if you use the whole bundle and poor value if you only wanted remote access.
TeamViewer: Licensing is generally organised around named operator seats, with limits on how many sessions or channels can run at once and how many devices can be enrolled for unattended access. The bill therefore moves with both headcount and estate size, and the two do not always grow at the same rate.
Prices and packaging in this market change several times a year, so this page deliberately quotes none. Take the meter descriptions above, apply them to your own operator count, shift pattern and device count on each vendor's current pricing page, and compare the two twelve-month totals including renewal.
Attended and unattended access
Both tools cover attended sessions, where somebody is sitting at the far end and consents to the connection, and unattended sessions to machines nobody is standing next to. That means the access model will not decide this for you, and the decision moves to what each one costs, how quickly a session starts and what the audit trail records.
Do check that both models sit on the plan you are being quoted rather than a higher one. Unattended access is the single most common capability to find one tier above the price you were shown, and discovering that after a purchase order is signed is an avoidable problem.
Platform coverage across a real estate
Coverage only matters where your awkward devices live. Most estates have a handful: a Linux build server, a Mac in the design team, a warehouse terminal on an old Windows build, a headless machine in a comms cupboard. Those are the machines to test, not the standard laptop everything supports.
LogMeIn / GoTo covers windows, macOS, iOS and Android, with browser-based operator access.
TeamViewer covers windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, iOS and Android, plus mobile device support and various embedded and industrial options.
Take your five most awkward devices and connect to each one during the trial. If a tool cannot reach them, no amount of feature comparison rescues it.
Security and administration questions for both
Ask both vendors the same short list, in writing, and compare the answers rather than the marketing. How is a session authenticated and can you enforce two-factor authentication on every operator? Is traffic encrypted end to end, and with what? Does the endpoint agent connect outbound, or does something have to be exposed inbound? Can you scope an operator to a subset of devices, and revoke that access in one action when somebody leaves?
Then ask what the audit log actually records, because this is where products differ most and datasheets say least. You want the named operator, the device, the start and end time, the client address and any file transferred, retained long enough to satisfy your own policy and exportable before a subscription lapses. A log you cannot export is evidence you do not really have.
- Verify on LogMeIn / GoTo: Price the bundle against what you will actually use, not what it contains.
- Verify on LogMeIn / GoTo: Confirm the number of unattended computers included and what each extra one costs.
- Verify on TeamViewer: Establish which edition contains the features you are assuming: unattended access, session recording and reporting are frequently plan-dependent.
- Verify on TeamViewer: Check the concurrency limit as well as the seat count, because two technicians sharing one channel is a working constraint, not a billing detail.
Which one fits which team
The useful output of a comparison is not a winner, it is a sentence describing the team each tool suits. If neither sentence below describes yours, both are probably the wrong shortlist and the requirement needs rewriting before you look at another vendor.
- Choose LogMeIn / GoTo if: Organisations that want a single supplier for remote support and adjacent helpdesk tooling.
- Choose TeamViewer if: Organisations that need the widest possible device coverage and are prepared to manage a larger licensing surface to get it.
- The question to settle about LogMeIn / GoTo: How much of the bundle will you use in twelve months, and what is the price of just the part you need?
- The question to settle about TeamViewer: Which edition includes every capability you have assumed, and what does that edition cost at renewal rather than at signup?
A two-week trial that settles LogMeIn against TeamViewer
1. Write the requirement down first
Five lines: the ratio of attended to unattended tickets, the platforms in the estate, the security controls you must be able to evidence, the reporting somebody asks you for, and your twelve-month budget. Compare against this, not against feature lists.
2. Enrol the same ten devices in both
Include your five most awkward machines. Same devices in both trials, or you are not comparing anything.
3. Run live tickets, not demos
Give each tool a week of real work with the technicians who will own it. A demo tests the salesperson; a ticket tests the product.
4. Time the boring things
Seconds from click to control, on a home or mobile connection. File transfer both ways. Multi-monitor. A reboot with automatic reconnection. These are the moments repeated dozens of times a day.
5. Read the audit log afterwards
Open the log for the sessions you ran and ask whether it names the operator, the device, the times and any file moved, and whether you can export it.
6. Price twelve months, including renewal
Apply both meters to your real numbers, add the second year, and ask each supplier in writing what the renewal uplift will be.
LogMeIn / GoTo and TeamViewer side by side
| Remote access and IT support suite | Remote support and remote access suite |
|---|---|
| Per-technician subscriptions with bundled modules | Named operator licences with concurrency limits |
| Attended and unattended | Attended and unattended |
| Windows, macOS, iOS and Android, with browser-based operator access. | Windows, macOS, Linux, ChromeOS, iOS and Android, plus mobile device support and various embedded and industrial options. |
| Organisations that want a single supplier for remote support and adjacent helpdesk tooling. | Organisations that need the widest possible device coverage and are prepared to manage a larger licensing surface to get it. |
| How much of the bundle will you use in twelve months, and what is the price of just the part you need? | Which edition includes every capability you have assumed, and what does that edition cost at renewal rather than at signup? |
Select any column heading to sort, or filter with the box above.
Common mistakes
- Comparing headline per-seat prices across two different meters, which is the single most expensive mistake in this category.
- Testing on the office network, where every tool feels fast and the difference you are paying for is invisible.
- Assuming a capability is included because the vendor sells it, rather than checking the plan on your quote.
- Letting a demo stand in for a trial, so the tool is judged on the salesperson's estate rather than yours.
- Ignoring the audit trail until an incident or an audit makes it urgent.
- Forgetting to ask about renewal, then discovering the uplift when the decision is already sunk.
Frequently asked questions
- Is LogMeIn / GoTo or TeamViewer better?
- Neither is better in the abstract, and any page that says otherwise is selling something. LogMeIn / GoTo suits organisations that want a single supplier for remote support and adjacent helpdesk tooling. TeamViewer suits organisations that need the widest possible device coverage and are prepared to manage a larger licensing surface to get it. Establish which of those descriptions matches your team, then trial the one that fits on your own tickets for two weeks.
- How do the licensing models differ?
- LogMeIn / GoTo is metered on per-technician subscriptions with bundled modules and TeamViewer on named operator licences with concurrency limits Because the meters differ in kind, compare twelve-month totals for your actual headcount and device count rather than headline per-seat figures. Ask both suppliers to quote the renewal price at the same time.
- Do both handle unattended access to servers?
- LogMeIn / GoTo: yes, unattended access to machines with an agent deployed is part of what it does. TeamViewer: yes, unattended access is part of what it does. In every case, confirm unattended access is on the specific plan you are quoting, and test a reboot-and-reconnect on a real server before you commit.
- What should I test during a trial?
- Time to a working session on a domestic or mobile connection, not the office LAN. A multi-monitor session. A file transfer both ways. A reboot with automatic reconnection. Then read the audit log for the sessions you just ran and decide whether it would satisfy an auditor.
- Where does 247connect fit against these two?
- 247connect is a focused remote access and support layer rather than the broadest platform on the market. It covers managed and on-demand access in one console, on fixed pricing with unlimited operators and five concurrent connections each, with zero-trust outbound connections and AES-256 encryption. If your requirement is fast, secure, predictably priced sessions rather than a wide management suite, it is worth putting in the same trial fortnight.
Why teams choose 247connect
Fixed, predictable pricing
Unlimited operators with five concurrent connections per user, so the bill does not move every time the team grows or a shift pattern changes.
Both access models in one console
Managed (unattended) access to devices you own and on-demand (attended) access to devices you do not, without buying two products.
Fast time to session
Sessions typically connect in around eight seconds, which is the number a support desk feels dozens of times a day.
Zero-trust, AES-256 encrypted
Outbound agent connections with no inbound port to forward, and every session logged against a named operator.
If the shortlist is really about fast, secure and predictably priced remote sessions rather than the broadest possible platform, add 247connect to the same trial fortnight. It covers managed and on-demand access in one console, with unlimited operators on fixed pricing, five concurrent connections per user, zero-trust outbound agent connections and AES-256 encryption. The 14-day trial includes 2 on-demand licences and 10 managed devices, with no credit card required, so you can measure it on the same ten devices you gave LogMeIn / GoTo and TeamViewer.
More head-to-head comparisons
LogMeIn vs RDP
A vendor-neutral comparison of LogMeIn / GoTo and Microsoft RDP: what each product is for, how their licensing meters differ, whether each covers attended and unattended access, the security and audit questions to ask both, and a two-week trial that produces a defensible decision.
LogMeIn vs Zoho Assist
A vendor-neutral comparison of LogMeIn / GoTo and Zoho Assist: what each product is for, how their licensing meters differ, whether each covers attended and unattended access, the security and audit questions to ask both, and a two-week trial that produces a defensible decision.
AnyDesk vs TeamViewer
A vendor-neutral comparison of AnyDesk and TeamViewer: what each product is for, how their licensing meters differ, whether each covers attended and unattended access, the security and audit questions to ask both, and a two-week trial that produces a defensible decision.
Related across the hub
Comparisons
TeamViewer alternatives, evaluated
A neutral guide to evaluating alternatives to established remote support suites: the capabilities that actually transfer, the licensing questions to ask, migration risks, and how to run a like-for-like trial without disrupting your helpdesk.
Alternatives
LogMeIn alternative
A vendor-neutral guide to reviewing a LogMeIn renewal and evaluating alternatives: separating remote access from the wider bundle, modelling twelve months under each licensing meter, the security rows that matter, and migrating without losing audit history.
Alternatives
TeamViewer pricing, explained
Understand how remote support licensing works before you compare quotes: named operators versus concurrent sessions versus managed devices, which capabilities usually sit in higher tiers, the contract terms that decide satisfaction, and how to model twelve months honestly.
Comparisons
Ad-hoc IDs vs unattended agents
A neutral comparison of the two remote access models — connecting by a per-session ID and password, versus an installed agent with centrally managed permissions — covering security, auditability, scale and where each one genuinely fits.
Best practice
Vendor security questions
The security questions worth asking any remote access vendor before buying, and why each one matters to your organisation.